If I Could Turn Back Time: A Snarky Stroll Through Daylight Saving Time History (Standard Time Returns Nov 2, 2025)
If I Could Turn Back Time: Brace yourselves, genealogists and time-travel enthusiasts: on Sunday, November 2, 2025, at 2:00 a.m., we literally turn back time. Daylight Saving Time (DST) ends, and we fall back to Standard Time, gaining a glorious extra hour of sleep (or research). Yes, that means your habitually late cousin might actually show up early for church, bewildered to find the parking lot empty. Cue Cher’s If I Could Turn Back Time on the genealogy soundtrack, because for one night we all get to do just that – set our clocks back and party like it’s 1883.
From Sundials to Chaos: Time Before Time Zones
Believe it or not, our 19th-century ancestors had it worse. Before time zones, time was a local free-for-all. Each town set its own clock by the sun – high noon was when the sun was directly overhead, simple as that. Sounds quaint until you realize by the mid-1800s there were over 100 (some say 144+) different local times across North America. Travel a few miles and you might need to reset your pocket watch. For genealogists poring over old train schedules or diary entries, this explains why Great-Grandpa’s 12:00 departure from one town got him to the next town by 11:50 – he arrived before he left, according to local time! The confusion wasn’t just comedic; it was deadly. Railroads, the high-speed internet of the 1800s, were crisscrossing the country, and their trains kept literally running into each other because of timing mix-ups. Something had to give.
Enter the railroads’ bold solution: Standard Time. On November 18, 1883 – known as “the Day of Two Noons” – American and Canadian railroads instituted a coordinated system of four time zones across the continent. At the designated moment, towns adjusted their local times to sync up with railroad time. Many places experienced a weird phenomenon: a duplicate hour or an extra noon that day (hence the nickname). Think of it as a 19th-century “fall back,” but with minutes instead of an hour. The change meant most folks only had to nudge their clocks by a few minutes to match the new zones.

“Backward, turn backward, O Time!” A Life magazine cartoon from January 1884 lampooned the new Standard Time. One character quips they must set the clock back four minutes – to which his daughter replies, “Four minutes! Put it back lots, Papa. Nothing less than ten years will do me any good!” (Ah, if only turning back time could actually make us younger…) This was the snark of 1884, showing not everyone embraced railroad time cheerfully.
Not everyone immediately jumped on the Standard Time train (pun intended). Imagine the townspeople grumbling that they now had to “eat, sleep, work…and marry by railroad time”. That gem comes from the Indianapolis Sentinel on the eve of the 1883 change, mocking the idea that even holy matrimony would run by locomotive schedules. Many communities initially resisted – after all, who were railroad barons to tell folks the time? But the practicality of standardization won out. By 1918, Congress made Standard Time the law of the land, finally dragging any stragglers into four (actually five) official time zones (Eastern, Central, Mountain, Pacific, and a then-new Alaska zone). The Standard Time Act of 1918 cemented what the railroads had started.
A captivating, surprising history of timekeeping and how it has shaped our world.
About Time: A History of Civilization in Twelve Clocks
Click HERE for more information!
Saving Daylight (and Energy?): The Daylight Saving Time Debut
Here’s where our time-travel saga gets really fun. That 1918 law didn’t just standardize time zones – it also introduced Daylight Saving Time nationwide for the first time. The idea was to shift clocks an hour forward in late March and back in October to conserve energy during World War I. By “saving” daylight later into the evening, Americans could supposedly save fuel (and give war workers an extra hour of sun after work). Sounds noble, right? Too bad people hated it. Turning clocks forward in spring meant losing an hour of sleep – an insult no amount of patriotic fervor could mend. Farmers were particularly peeved (cows don’t care what your clock says, they want to be milked on sun time). Jokes flew that DST really stood for “Daylight Starving Time” as farmers had to wait an extra hour to feed the critters. The backlash was swift: once WWI ended, the DST provision was repealed in 1919. America promptly returned to eternal Standard Time, and DST was left on the legislative shelf labeled “Bad Ideas – Do Not Resuscitate.”
Well, at least until the next war. World War II rolled around and guess what came shambling back like a zombie policy? Yup, nationwide DST was reinstated in 1942, rebranded as “War Time” to make it sound heroic. From February 9, 1942 until September 30, 1945, the U.S. stayed on DST year-round to save energy for the war effort. Your ancestors in that era experienced some truly odd timing; if you see a 1943 birth certificate or military log noting “Eastern War Time,” that’s just fancy talk for DST in the Eastern Time Zone. After V-J Day in ’45, the country warily turned back the clocks to peacetime… and chaos ensued.
The Wild West of Time: 20 Years of Clock Confusion
From 1945 until 1966, the U.S. federal government took a hands-off approach to Daylight Saving. It was every state (and city) for themselves. The result? An ungodly patchwork of time observances that only a genealogist with a wall-sized map and multicolored pins could love. Some states observed DST, others didn’t. Some cities said, “heck yes” to fast time while the county next door said “nope.” In one notable absurd example, bus drivers on a 35-mile route in West Virginia and Ohio had to reset their watches seven times during the trip because of zigzagging through DST-observing and non-observing areas. Imagine the timetable: depart 8:00 (or 9:00?) and arrive… sometime today, hopefully. If Grandma ever told you “back in my day, we never knew what time it was,” she wasn’t far off.
One particularly amusing (or exasperating) story comes from Connecticut in 1920: the town of Old Lyme stuck to Standard Time while nearby New London and New Haven opted for DST. A perplexed resident wrote that if he left Old Lyme at 2:00, it was 3:00 by the time he got to New London – effectively time-traveling an hour into the future in a short drive. The solution for some weary travelers was simply to wear two wristwatches – one on “standard” and one on “daylight” time – to avoid missing trains and appointments.

Travel was so confusing around 1920 that some people resorted to wearing two watches: one set to Standard Time, the other to Daylight Saving Time. This 1920 newspaper photo shows a savvy traveler prepared to dodge time mix-ups. As the Boston Post noted, “Train Users [were] Confused by New Daylight Saving Time,” so a spare watch was a must!
By the 1960s, airlines, railroads, and broadcast networks were fed up with this temporal circus. Having 23 flavors of time was great for Baskin-Robbins, not so much for interstate commerce. Thus in 1966, Congress passed the Uniform Time Act, mercifully bringing order to the horological chaos. This act standardized DST nationwide (for those states that wanted to observe it) with a single schedule: clocks would spring forward on the last Sunday in April and fall back on the last Sunday in October. At last, the nation had a cohesive system: no more rogue city council deciding it was Daylight Saving in Dallas but Standard in San Antonio. If a state didn’t want to play along, it could opt out entirely – but the catch was all or nothing (the whole state, not individual counties). That’s why today only Hawaii and most of Arizona sit out DST, enjoying their sun without switches. (They’ve watched the rest of us stumble around changing microwave clocks twice a year and decided, “Nah, we’re good.”)
Modern Tweaks and Ongoing Tussles
You’d think the 1966 Act settled things. Ha! This is America – land of eternal daylight saving debates. Over the years, Congress fiddled with DST’s timing more than a genealogy buff fiddles with spelling variations of a surname. In 1974, during the oil crisis, they tried an experiment: year-round DST for nearly two years. The idea was to save energy again. The result? Parents freaked out as kids went to school in pitch-dark winter mornings, and late-risers rejoiced at not seeing dawn until after 8:30 a.m. The nation got its extra evening light in January, sure – but at the cost of some very cranky morning commuters. Public opinion swung faster than a pendulum clock, going from 79% approval to deep regret within weeks as pre-dawn car accidents involving schoolkids made headlines. By the fall of 1974, the plug was pulled on permanent DST; Congress hurriedly returned to the standard winter time for 1975. Moral of the story: “Springing forward” sounds great until you’re prying yourself out of bed in midwinter darkness.
After that kerfuffle, DST survived but got a curfew: stick to summers only. In 1986, the start date moved up to early April (because why not tinker a little more?). Then in 2005, feeling ambitious, lawmakers extended DST further – starting in March and ending in November from 2007 onward. That’s the schedule we have now: roughly mid-March to early November, which means we spend about eight months on “saving” time and only four on standard. Apparently we like saving daylight so much, we do it two-thirds of the year (never mind the dubious energy savings; modern studies show it’s pretty minimal).
Yet, despite all this fine-tuning, nobody can agree if DST is a brilliant idea or the dumbest ritual since New Year’s resolutions. In recent years, a growing chorus of sleep scientists, politicians, and grumpy Facebook users have called for us to stop the madness of clock changing. Over 30 U.S. states have toyed with legislation to make DST permanent (no more fall-back, just stay on “summer time” all year) or, less commonly, to stick to standard time year-round. The movement even has a catchy slogan: “Lock the Clock.” Every year, we hear calls to “just pick one and end this biannual charade!” Fun fact: the U.S. Senate unanimously passed the Sunshine Protection Act in 2022 to make DST permanent – proving that Congress can agree on something, if only on the premise that we all hate changing clocks. However, the bill stalled in the House, so as of 2025, we’re still doing the time warp twice a year. (Maybe they were waiting to see if we’d miss showing up early to church and confusing our pets?)
Turning Back Time: Enjoying (or Enduring) the Tradition
So here we are, about to return to Standard Time on Nov 2, 2025, like it’s a brand-new idea and not a 107-year-old habit we can’t quit. You might be wondering, what’s the point? Officially, it’s still about “energy savings,” though that’s debated. Unofficially, it’s about the extra hour of sleep in autumn – our reward for surviving the cruel hour loss in spring. For genealogists and family historians, maybe it’s also a tiny homage to our ancestors’ resilience with time shifts: from the jumble of local sun times, to “railroad time,” to “War Time,” to the confusing patchwork of the 1950s. If Great-Grandma could handle figuring out train schedules across seven time changes in 35 miles, you can handle changing your oven clock and not complaining (too much) on Facebook.
Before you revel in that bonus hour, a few snarky reminders:
- It’s “Daylight Saving Time,” not “Savings.” Yes, we all say “savings” out of habit – even your know-it-all brother-in-law does. But the pundits insist the correct term is singular. (Apparently we’re saving daylight, not opening a bank account for it.) Will using the right term make you an instant hit at genealogy society meetings? Probably not, but it might score a nod from the resident grammar nerd. Then again, language evolves – enough people say “Savings” that dictionaries shrug and list it as an acceptable Still, if you want to be historically and grammatically proper, drop that “s.”
- Expect the biannual snark-fest. Social media will be full of memes about changing clocks, people griping “Why do we still do this?!” and perhaps a few Star Wars jokes (“I feel a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of schedules suddenly cried out in terror…”). It’s basically a national pastime to complain about DST changes. Join in or just watch with popcorn.
- Those who despise clock switching will use the occasion to rant – and they have a point. The practice has critics across the spectrum: from sleep scientists citing health impacts of the spring change, to farmers (wrongly blamed for DST in the first place) who never liked it, to just about everyone who has missed a meeting or flight because they forgot the time change. While you’re enjoying your extra Z’s, somewhere a politician is surely drafting the next bill to end DST forever – or to make it permanent. Stay tuned (and don’t hold your breath).
Finally, don’t forget the real joy of “falling back”: watching the chronically late people in your life experience a rare moment of punctuality. This is the Sunday when that friend who usually slips into the 10 a.m. service at 10:20 ends up bewildered in the parking lot at 9:00, wondering why the doors are still locked. Savor it – poetic justice comes but once a year.
As family historians, we often wish we could literally turn back time to meet our ancestors or fix an erroneous citation. On Nov 2, we kind of get our wish, even if it’s just an hour. So set those antique cuckoo clocks back, relish the extra hour (perhaps use it to label those old family photos or add citations to your family tree – you knew I’d say that), and enjoy living in Standard Time – at least until March rolls around and we commence this crazy dance anew.
In the words of (a slightly paraphrased) Cher: If I could turn back time… I’d probably still have to explain to everyone why we’re doing this! Happy time-traveling, and may your genealogical timing always be impeccable.
* * *
Author’s Note: I want to be transparent that this article – If I Could Turn Back Time: A Snarky Stroll Through Daylight Saving Time History (Standard Time Returns Nov 2, 2025) – was created in part with the help of an artificial intelligence (AI) language model – ChatGPT 5o PRO with Deep Reasoning. The AI assisted in generating an early draft of the article, but every paragraph was subsequently reviewed, edited, and refined by me. The final content is the result of extensive human curation and creativity. I am proud to present this work and assure readers that while AI was a tool in the process, the story, style, and substance have been carefully shaped by the author.





